Burnham States He Cannot Initiate Leadership Campaign Without Parliamentary Seat

Andy Burnham has expressed that he is currently unable to commence a leadership campaign.

“Launching a leadership campaign is not feasible for me as I am not a member of parliament. That is the fundamental reality,” Burnham stated.

He further clarified that it would be incorrect to assume he is eager to return to London.

Reflecting on his early career in the 1990s, Burnham noted that moving to London was once essential for young professionals seeking advancement. However, he emphasized that the situation has changed, and now, leaving Manchester would require significant persuasion. “They would have to pull me out of Manchester,” he remarked.

Rowena Mason serves as the Guardian’s Whitehall editor.

Pat McFadden, the newly appointed Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, has expressed a commitment to thoroughly investigate the reasons behind the rising number of individuals off work due to mental health issues and claiming sickness benefits.

Speaking at a TBI fringe event, McFadden emphasized the importance of a leader’s “duty of curiosity” to understand the root causes of this trend and to develop effective policies in response.

As of April 2024, approximately four million people in the UK were receiving health-related benefits, a significant increase from three million in 2019.

McFadden indicated that after a comprehensive review, the government might adopt distinct policy approaches for physical disabilities and mental health conditions within the benefits system.

Earlier this year, Keir Starmer advocated for reforms to the benefits system, highlighting the “devastating” impact of sickness-related absences. However, he faced resistance from Labour MPs, which led to the withdrawal of some proposed cuts.

McFadden stated that politicians must present well-founded arguments to justify any proposed changes, underscoring his intention to focus on creating opportunities and promoting employment as a solution.

In his conference speech, McFadden did not directly address the complex issue of mental health-related sickness absence but highlighted a key policy developed with the Treasury. This policy mandates that young people unemployed for over 18 months must participate in work placements or risk losing their benefits.

“It’s wrong in human terms, and costly for the nation too. And we will not stand by while a generation is consigned to benefits almost before their lives have begun.”

“We will never accept that children should graduate from school onto a life on benefits. And we will not allow wasted talent to become Britain’s story.”

David Lammy, Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Secretary, used his conference address to uplift Labour members by reflecting on the party’s history of overcoming adversity.

• Lammy reminded attendees that governing through difficult times is a familiar challenge for Labour.

“Conference, governing in hard times is not new to our party or our movement.

From 1945, as Attlee’s Labour led the nation out of World War Two, rationing persisted and public patience wore thin. But did Attlee, Bevan, and Morrison falter?

No. They established the NHS, created New Towns, and built the welfare state.

In 1967, Harold Wilson’s government faced currency devaluation and the divisive rise of Enoch Powell the following year. Did Wilson back down?

No. He championed the White Heat of Technology, founded the Open University, and passed the Equal Pay Act.

When I entered Parliament in 2000, Tony Blair’s Labour confronted fuel protests and boos at conference speeches.

Did we surrender?

No. We persevered, investing record sums in schools and hospitals, introducing the minimum wage, and launching Sure Start for every child.

This is Labour’s legacy: confronting tough choices head-on.”

• He highlighted Labour’s tangible achievements under current governance.

“Five interest rate reductions. The fastest economic growth among G7 nations. Wages rising more in ten months than in the previous decade under the Tories.

We have reduced NHS waiting lists, delivering five million extra appointments against a promise of two million.

Parents now benefit from thirty hours of free childcare, saving up to £7,500 annually.

Trade agreements have been secured with the EU, the US, and India.

Planning reforms have unlocked billions, enabling the highest housebuilding rates in decades.

That is the impact of a Labour government.”

• Lammy expressed confidence in Labour’s potential to regain electoral strength and win the next general election.

“And friends, when you see Nigel Farage measuring the curtains of Downing Street, look globally.

In Australia, Labor was trailing by ten points – then they won.

In Canada, the Liberals were twenty points behind – then they won.

In Norway, Labour was down by sixteen points – then they won.

The lesson is clear: progressives triumph when we align our values with pragmatic realism.

Not through scapegoating or gimmicks, but through hope, purpose, and progress.”

Bridget Phillipson, the Secretary of State for Education, has revealed plans to reintroduce targeted, means-tested maintenance grants for students in England ahead of the upcoming general election.

During her address at the conference, she emphasized:

“Today, I am announcing that under a Labour government, new targeted maintenance grants will be made available to students who need them most.

Conference, the time young people spend at college or university should be dedicated to learning and training,

not juggling multiple jobs to make ends meet.

This is the tangible difference a Labour government will deliver.”

Labour’s official statement highlighted that these grants aim to support tens of thousands of students from low-income backgrounds pursuing level 4 to 6 qualifications in priority subjects aligned with the industrial strategy and the party’s broader vision for revitalizing Britain.

“These maintenance grants will provide essential financial assistance to working-class youth undertaking university degrees and technical qualifications under the Lifelong Learning Entitlement, including Certificates and Diplomas of Higher Education, as well as other technical credentials and degrees.

The funding for these grants will be sourced entirely from a newly introduced international student levy, ensuring that revenue generated from international students directly benefits domestic working-class students and fosters growth and opportunity.

Further specifics regarding the maintenance grants and the International Student Levy will be detailed in the forthcoming autumn statement.”

Additional information from the Department for Education can be found here.

Helena Horton reports on environmental issues for the Guardian.

Emily Thornberry, chair of the foreign affairs select committee, has cautioned the government against permitting Elon Musk to gain control over the UK’s energy grid.

In July, Tesla submitted an application to Ofgem seeking a license to supply electricity directly to households across Britain.

Energy Secretary Ed Miliband declined to comment on the matter yesterday, stating, “This is a decision for the regulator.”

At a Labour Climate and Environment Forum during the party conference, Thornberry emphasized the need for the government to carefully evaluate Tesla’s application, warning it could pose a threat to national security.

She remarked:

“I have serious reservations about Elon Musk’s intentions and the potential impact on our country. Infrastructure investment decisions must prioritize security above all else.

We need to thoroughly assess whether it is appropriate for someone like Musk to be allowed to invest in critical UK infrastructure.”

Musk recently sparked controversy by calling for the British government’s overthrow and was accused of inciting unrest during a far-right rally in the UK.

Thornberry further noted:

“It’s telling that China prohibits Teslas near government and public buildings due to espionage concerns.”

She also urged Keir Starmer to attend the upcoming COP climate summit and suggested King Charles should be allowed to represent the UK at the event in November.

Thornberry stated:

“In six weeks, I will attend COP 30 in Belem to observe global government actions on climate change. This is a crucial opportunity for our government’s leadership to be visible, ideally with senior figures including the prime minister participating actively.

Of course, the King should be permitted to attend; I’m sure he is eager to do so.”

Andy Burnham is set to join a live Q&A session with the Guardian’s Politics Weekly podcast during the Labour conference. The discussion will be hosted by Pippa Crerar and Kiran Stacey.

A live stream of the event is available here.

Labour’s new policing minister has announced plans to seek public input on the deployment of live facial recognition (LFR) technology before considering its broader implementation across England, according to Rajeev Syal.

Related: Labour intends to consult on live facial recognition use prior to wider adoption

Back in 2021, Rachel Reeves, in her inaugural address as shadow chancellor at a Labour conference, unveiled an ambitious £28 billion annual investment plan focused on green jobs. This kind of bold, transformative policy is what energizes party conferences. At that time, despite the UK grappling with significant Covid-related debt, there was still a hopeful outlook for the economy’s trajectory in the latter half of the decade. Fast forward four years, and Reeves’ second conference speech as chancellor was notable for its relative lack of groundbreaking announcements.

The reason is clear: with officials advising that tax increases of around £30 billion are necessary, a large-scale investment spree reminiscent of Gordon Brown’s era is off the table. Instead, Reeves highlighted initiatives such as the Youth Guarantee, the introduction of libraries in primary schools, and a youth mobility scheme with the European Union. While these are positive steps, they lack the scale and impact expected from a chancellor’s keynote in times when the UK wasn’t burdened by £100 billion annually in debt interest payments. Moreover, given the government’s earlier stance of having “no plans” for a youth mobility scheme, skepticism about the ambition behind this proposal is understandable.

Despite the modesty of her announcements, Reeves delivered a compelling argument that resonated well with the conference audience. She emphasized the government’s existing achievements and ongoing infrastructure projects prioritized under her leadership. Reeves firmly defended her fiscal discipline and the necessity of borrowing controls, subtly critiquing Andy Burnham’s approach without direct confrontation. Her primary critique was aimed at the Conservative party, contrasting with other speakers who have focused on Reform UK. Reeves appears to have devoted considerable thought to the party’s economic challenges, an area where blaming Reform UK is less straightforward.

When faced with heckling during her speech, Reeves responded effectively, echoing a retort used by Keir Starmer during a similar disruption in 2021. Her quick-witted reply won the crowd’s support, maintaining their engagement until the conclusion of her address. Although her speech offered more reassurance than substantial new policies, the audience found it sufficiently inspiring in the moment.

Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, is concluding her address to the conference.

Whatever challenges lie ahead, hold onto hope because our party and nation have triumphed over far greater obstacles before.

Believe in the cause, recalling John Smith’s inspiring words about the privilege of service that brought us here.

Trust that this Labour government will persevere-I will persevere-until we achieve a Britain that values contribution, opens doors to opportunity, and silences the persistent doubts of decline.

And never accept the claim that there is no distinction between a Labour government and a Conservative one.

Reeves envisions a “better Britain” within our grasp: a nation where barriers to opportunity are dismantled, confidently engaging with the world despite uncertainty, driven by the efforts of its people, optimistic about a shared future-a proud, thriving Labour Britain.

Reeves then shifts focus to the UK’s relationship with Europe.

We must not sever young people from opportunities that previous generations took for granted, which means rejecting isolationist politics that impose the heaviest burdens on our youth.

We must resist voices claiming to act in the national interest while demanding our communities and businesses bear the cost of a Britain cut off from Europe.

I want young people to have the chance to broaden their horizons through travel, cultural exchange, work, and study abroad-opportunities that should never be exclusive to the privileged few.

Therefore, alongside facilitating trade and travel with Europe, I can announce that we are negotiating with the European Union to secure an ambitious youth mobility agreement, maximizing economic and cultural prospects for young Britons.

So, conference, never let anyone convince you there is no difference between a Labour government and a Conservative government.

Reeves warns that Reform UK poses the greatest threat to the living standards of working people in the upcoming election.

We face critical choices for our country’s future, and whatever challenges arise, I pledge to you that I will safeguard the trust the British people have placed in us.

The most significant danger to our way of life and workers’ livelihoods is the agenda pushed by Nigel Farage and the Reform party.

At the next election, voters will decide between a Labour government committed to the most substantial enhancement of workers’ rights in decades, or a Reform Party that has consistently opposed these rights.

It will be a choice between a Labour government standing with allies and Reform, which is “aligned with Vladimir Putin,” Reeves asserts.

Voters will also choose between a party that embraces economic responsibility and one that supported Liz Truss’s disastrous mini-budget.

Finally, the decision will be between Labour, dedicated to the NHS, and Reform, which opposes the very principle of publicly funded healthcare.

Reflecting on recent history, Reeves recalls how three years ago the Conservative Party plunged into “utter irrelevance” following the economic turmoil caused by Liz Truss.

Labour must avoid repeating such mistakes.

She criticizes those who suggest abandoning fiscal responsibility, calling such ideas “dangerously wrong.”

We must be candid about the consequences of unchecked spending. When market confidence falters, the impact is immediate-rising costs for essentials and higher interest rates.

There is nothing progressive or Labour-like about a government spending one in every ten pounds of public funds just to service debt-billions paid annually to overseas hedge funds and investors, debt accumulated by the Tories.

This message appears directed at figures like Andy Burnham and the Labour left, following his recent remarks on government debt and bond markets.

UPDATE: Reeves emphasized:

Even amid global financial uncertainty, some critics forget the fallout from reckless economic decisions.

Remember that in just two hours one Friday nearly three years ago, the Conservatives under Liz Truss caused mortgage rates to soar, jeopardized pensions, and condemned their party to defeat and irrelevance.

That was a stark warning, and the British public will not forgive any party that repeats it. Let us reaffirm our commitment never to inflict such harm on working people.

Yet, some still advocate abandoning fiscal discipline and removing spending limits. They are dangerously mistaken, and we must be honest about what that would entail.

Reeves highlights the government’s success in recovering nearly £400 million lost during the Covid pandemic, thanks to the efforts of the Covid corruption commissioner.

We are reclaiming those funds and redirecting them to where they belong-our communities, schools, and the National Health Service.

She proudly lists Labour’s accomplishments since taking office, noting that in just 451 days, the government has outperformed its 5,000-plus days in opposition.

Achievements include:

Introducing Britain’s first genuine living wage, initiating new infrastructure projects in roads and rail, supporting community initiatives like Pride in Place-including the reopening of Southport pier in Merseyside-investing in domestic energy production, freezing fuel duty, capping bus fares, recruiting additional neighborhood police officers, expanding school breakfast clubs and free school meals, lifting 100,000 children out of poverty, and delivering well-earned pay rises to nurses, teachers, police, and armed forces.

Moreover, we are preparing the NHS for the future with a record £29 billion annual funding boost-the NHS was created, protected, and continues to be safeguarded by Labour governments.

During the speech, a pro-Gaza protester interrupted, shouting about genocide.

Reeves responded by affirming the government’s recognition of a Palestinian state.

She emphasized that Labour has evolved and is no longer a party of protest, which is why she stands before them as Chancellor of the Exchequer.

The delegates applauded, effectively silencing the heckler.

Earlier, a welder was invited on stage to share his experience.

He recounted meeting Reeves at the GMB conference when the Sizewell C project was announced, expressing pride and excitement that union voices were finally being heard.

The government’s commitment to investing in future industries was clear, he said.

Sizewell C represents a £14 billion investment and will generate enough energy to power six million homes.

GMB members feel a renewed pride in their industry, having finally been acknowledged.

The government is investing in a brighter future for all of Britain, he concluded.

Reeves began her speech by thanking Matt for his warm introduction.

She reiterated pride in announcing the Sizewell C investment, emphasizing Labour’s choice of investment over decline when it came to power.

She contrasted this with the Conservative Party’s opposition to such investments from the outset, underscoring the clear differences between Labour and the Tories.

Severin Carrell, the Guardian’s Scotland editor, reports:

Scottish Labour leaders have outlined their overarching strategy to reclaim ground in next year’s Holyrood election, cautioning candidates and activists that time is running out to overturn a significant polling gap.

Despite trailing the Scottish National Party by 17 points, Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, expressed confidence at a Politico event in Liverpool that pollsters and commentators underestimate his party’s potential while exaggerating the threat posed by Reform UK.

Humza Yousaf’s unexpected defeat in the recent Holyrood by-election for Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse, where Scottish Labour secured a victory despite dismal national polling and a rising Reform UK presence, has been described by Anas Sarwar as a “foreshadowing of next year’s political landscape.”

Sarwar elaborated:

“Reform UK is attempting to stir up discord, aiming to fracture our unity with a ‘plague on all your houses’ strategy, which was decisively rejected and likely alarmed many across Scotland.”

“Meanwhile, John Swinney and the SNP chose not to defend their record during the by-election, nor do they intend to in the upcoming election. This is understandable, as their focus has shifted to independence-not because they expect a majority, but as a diversion from their governance failures.”

“Labour, on the other hand, executed the most effective grassroots campaign in our history, complemented by a sophisticated and targeted digital strategy. We concentrated on the issues that resonate with voters, and I am genuinely optimistic that replicating this approach next year will secure us victory.”

In a political environment marked by unpredictability and the disruption of traditional party allegiances by Reform UK, Labour strategists are confident that success lies in building a “transactional coalition” of voters. This coalition would be galvanized by widespread dissatisfaction with the SNP’s domestic performance.

At a Scottish Fabians fringe event, Jackie Baillie, Sarwar’s deputy and the architect behind most of Scottish Labour’s new Holyrood candidates, alongside Douglas Alexander, the newly appointed Scotland secretary, presented complementary timelines emphasizing the urgency of Labour’s campaign efforts.

Alexander, who took over following Keir Starmer’s controversial decision to dismiss Ian Murray as Scotland secretary, remarked:

“Post-conference, we have eight weeks leading up to the Labour budget at November’s end, followed by ten weeks of intense political activity before Christmas. From January 1st to March 31st, there are another twelve weeks, culminating in a brief but intense campaign period. For all candidates, this means sleepless nights and relentless effort in the months ahead.”

Baillie reinforced this message, stating, “The election is just seven months away-221 days. While Douglas broke this down into segments, every single day demands hard work, and I will be monitoring progress closely.”

At today’s conference, Labour activists are set to introduce a motion accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza.

The morning session will focus on foreign policy, featuring two urgent motions concerning the Middle East conflict.

During the drafting process last night, tensions arose as the Labour leadership advocated for language in one motion stating that “the United Nations independent commission of inquiry found a risk of genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.”

Activists criticized this phrasing as misleading and pro-Israel, emphasizing that the commission did not merely identify a “risk” but declared that genocide is actively occurring. The UN report explicitly states this.

A separate motion, backed by unions Unison and Aslef, asserts that the commission concluded “Israeli authorities and Israeli security forces have committed the crime of genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.”

Ben Jamal, director of the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign, remarked that if this motion passes, it would represent a significant setback for Starmer.

He elaborated:

Trade unions and conference delegates have compelled the party to permit a debate and vote on Palestine after numerous motions were initially blocked.

Despite government opposition, trade unions and Labour members will now vote on a motion endorsing the UN commission of inquiry’s findings, which confirm Israel’s commission of genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, and call for decisive measures, including a comprehensive arms embargo on Israel.

The developments within the conference mirror the mounting pressure from the solidarity movement-members of Starmer’s own party share growing outrage over Britain’s ongoing complicity in Israel’s actions and demand an end to it.

Severin Carrell is the Guardian’s Scotland editor.

Scottish Labour’s leadership has publicly criticized Andy Burnham, a former Labour leadership hopeful, dismissing his recent interventions as “nonsense” and urging him to remain focused on his role as Manchester mayor.

In a coordinated response, Anas Sarwar, leader of Scottish Labour, stated at a conference fringe event:

Andy is doing a fantastic job as the mayor of Manchester. I believe the people of Manchester need him.

Meanwhile, Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour’s deputy leader, was more forthright during a Fabians fringe meeting:

My message to this Labour party conference-and particularly to the individual who styles himself the king of the North-is clear: Manchester needs you. We must end this distraction and concentrate on the upcoming elections.

Scottish Labour’s frustration stems from Burnham’s comments fueling perceptions of instability within Starmer’s leadership, at a time when Labour faces a challenging battle to unseat the Scottish National Party in next May’s Scottish Parliament elections, as well as contests in Wales and English local councils.

This disagreement strains what was once a collaborative relationship. Scottish Labour has worked alongside Burnham and other metro mayors, like Tracy Brabin in West Yorkshire, to advance Labour’s broader constitutional agenda aimed at empowering the UK’s nations and regions.

Although Labour strategists anticipate a rebound in polling once the election campaign begins, recent surveys show Scottish Labour trailing the SNP and closely matched with Reform UK. The latest Norstat poll for the Times and Sunday Times in Scotland places the SNP at 34% in constituency voting, Reform UK at 20%, and Labour at 17%.

Michael Marra, Scottish Labour’s finance spokesperson, summed up the party’s stance bluntly: “I think he should shut up.”

Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, has concluded her media appearances. While her remarks on Reform UK have attracted attention, her comments on the economy and upcoming budget carry greater significance.

Here is a detailed summary of her statements, including new and expanded quotes:

• Reeves suggested it is possible to endorse a policy with racist implications without being racist. (See 8.09am.) This was a rebuttal to Reform UK’s claim that Keir Starmer’s criticism of their plan to end indefinite leave to remain as racist was an attack on their supporters. Nigel Farage, Reform UK’s leader, told the Daily Mail:

The prime minister has insulted those who believe mass migration should end. Starmer thinks anyone on a time-limited visa deserves to stay in Britain indefinitely. Labour opposes border controls and labels anyone who supports them as racist.

• Reeves effectively retreated from her previous pledge to the CBI not to impose tax increases on the scale seen last year. During a Q&A at the CBI in November 2024, she stated she was “not coming back with more borrowing or more taxes.” The Conservatives interpreted this as a promise of no further tax hikes, though she never explicitly repeated it. Today, Reeves argued that global circumstances have shifted since last November. When BBC’s Nick Robinson asked if she would reaffirm the pledge against more borrowing or taxes, Reeves responded:

Everyone can see the world has changed in the past year. We are affected by wars in Europe and the Middle East, increased trade barriers due to US tariffs, and the global cost of borrowing. We are not immune to these factors.

In an LBC interview, Reeves dismissed some media reports about planned tax rises as “rubbish.” (See 8.27am.) However, on ITV’s Good Morning Britain, when questioned about a report from ITV’s Robert Peston suggesting the Treasury expects £30bn in tax increases in the budget, she took a more cautious tone and did not strongly dispute the figure. (See 8.46am.)

• Reeves confirmed that the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) is reassessing its productivity forecasts, which will influence her fiscal plans. She told the Today programme:

The OBR is reviewing productivity data based on past government performance, and if changes are made, we must adjust accordingly because it’s crucial.

“Adjust” here implies potential spending cuts, as Heather Stewart detailed in a recent report.

• Reeves declined to rule out extending the freeze on income tax thresholds in the upcoming budget. This freeze effectively increases tax burdens as allowances fail to keep pace with inflation. On BBC Breakfast, when asked to dismiss the possibility of another freeze, Reeves replied, “I’m not going to be able to do that,” suggesting an extension is likely.

• She reaffirmed Labour’s manifesto promise not to raise VAT. Like Keir Starmer yesterday, she insisted the commitment “stands,” though she stopped short of explicitly ruling out VAT increases. This ambiguity has sparked speculation that Labour might alter VAT policy in ways that technically comply with the pledge but could still raise costs. The manifesto states the party will not “increase” VAT, typically interpreted as the headline rate, but could also relate to the range of goods and services taxed. Reeves emphasized protecting people from tax hikes that worsen living costs during an interview on ITV’s Good Morning Britain.

The manifesto stands because working people have borne the brunt of economic mismanagement by the previous government, and cost-of-living challenges remain their top concern.

That’s why I’m committed to improving the financial well-being of working people and avoiding increases in key taxes they pay. These commitments are why we made the manifesto promises, and we stand by them.

• Reeves expressed a desire to reduce the number of major economic forecasts produced annually by the OBR from two to one. Currently, legislation requires two forecasts per year, which forces frequent adjustments to fiscal plans. Reeves supports the International Monetary Fund’s recommendation for a single annual fiscal event to provide greater stability for families and businesses. She told Times Radio:

The IMF has advised moving to one major fiscal event annually, and I agree. To achieve this, the OBR’s forecasting process needs to change. Two full forecasts a year make it difficult to maintain a single fiscal event.

There are options, such as shorter-term forecasts or updates focusing on economic changes during the year.

My goal is to create stability for families and businesses. One criticism of the previous government was constant policy shifts, which made it hard to keep up.

Rachel Reeves, currently serving as Chancellor, appeared on ITV’s Good Morning Britain, where she was interviewed by Ed Balls, a former Labour shadow chancellor. During the discussion, Balls referenced a recent report indicating that Treasury officials expect the upcoming budget to include tax increases totaling around £30 billion. Reeves acknowledged that the Office for Budget Responsibility has yet to release the final economic forecasts that will shape the budget, but she did not dispute the suggested figure.

In a separate interview on the Today programme, Reeves addressed a Financial Times report suggesting she plans to urge business leaders to recognize the economic risks posed by a potential Reform UK government. She is expected to highlight this message at the Labour conference, emphasizing the contrast between Labour’s commitment to economic stability and Reform UK’s policies, which she associates with the turmoil following Liz Truss’s mini-budget. When questioned about potential backlash from businesses due to anticipated tax hikes, Reeves dismissed such concerns.

Reeves also responded to questions about the relationship between taxation and economic growth, stressing that growth is not solely dependent on tax policy. She pointed to government reforms in planning regulations as a means to stimulate economic expansion. Addressing speculation about who might be affected by tax changes, particularly those with investments or valuable assets, Reeves criticized much of the pre-budget conjecture as unfounded and irresponsible.

Drawing inspiration from Gordon Brown’s youth employment initiatives during the Blair era, Reeves announced plans to introduce a new Youth Guarantee. This initiative aims to provide young people with opportunities for work and training, with the goal of eradicating long-term youth unemployment, much like the previous Labour government’s successful New Deal program. She reaffirmed the government’s commitment to investing in skills and supporting young people’s prospects.

During an interview with Nick Robinson on the Today programme, Reeves was challenged on Labour’s fiscal discipline, with Robinson suggesting that the government had compromised on its earlier promises. Reeves acknowledged the difficult circumstances faced upon Labour’s return to power but maintained that the government remains committed to economic responsibility. She admitted that some tough decisions had to be made, including changes to winter fuel payments and disability benefits, but insisted that all tax-related decisions remain intact.

Reeves was also questioned about potential welfare spending cuts, noting that expenditures on health and disability benefits are projected to rise significantly by the end of the parliamentary term. She indicated that Disability Minister Stephen Timms is reviewing these issues and acknowledged that the benefits bill is currently too high.

In an LBC interview, Reeves dismissed calls for increased government borrowing, responding to comments by Andy Burnham about bond markets. When asked if Burnham’s stance was reminiscent of Liz Truss’s approach, Reeves agreed, warning that excessive borrowing risks repeating past mistakes.

Addressing a question about Keir Starmer’s recent remarks labeling Reform UK’s policy to end indefinite leave to remain as racist, Reeves clarified that while supporting a racist policy does not necessarily make someone racist, she firmly condemned the policy itself as racist and harmful to the country. She emphasized that many Reform UK supporters would be appalled by the idea of deporting legally residing, contributing members of society.

Regarding the UK’s economic growth outlook, Reeves countered claims that the country lags behind other G7 nations. She cited OECD forecasts predicting the UK will have the second-fastest growing economy among the G7 this year and next, and noted that the UK economy grew by 1% in the first half of the year, outpacing its peers.

When pressed about the possibility of a VAT increase in the upcoming budget, Reeves reiterated the government’s commitment to not raising VAT, emphasizing that this promise remains firm because the government wants working people to be better off by the end of the parliamentary term. She acknowledged that commitments stand until circumstances force a change but assured listeners that the government intends to uphold its pledges.

Pippa Crerar of the Guardian reveals that Rachel Reeves plans to introduce funding aimed at establishing a library in every primary school across England.

Related: Rachel Reeves pledges a library in every primary school in England

Meanwhile, Shabana Mahmood, the Home Secretary, is scheduled to deliver a speech at the conference today. Various newspapers are highlighting the key points she is expected to address. Rajeev Syal offers an insightful preview of her remarks for the Guardian.

Related: High standard of English to be required for leave to remain, Mahmood to pledge

For a broader perspective, here are the leading headlines from the Telegraph and the Times, capturing the day’s major political developments.

Breaking News: A Fresh Look at Today’s Leading Newspaper Front Pages

Telegraph’s Bold Front Page

The Telegraph’s cover today captures attention with a striking image that encapsulates the core of the story. The photograph, credited to the Daily Telegraph, vividly portrays the unfolding events, offering readers a compelling visual narrative. This front page stands out for its clear messaging and impactful presentation, drawing readers into the detailed coverage inside.

The Times’ Compelling Headline

Meanwhile, The Times presents a powerful headline accompanied by a vivid photograph that highlights the essence of the news story. The image, sourced from The Times, complements the headline by providing a visual context that enhances the reader’s understanding. The layout is designed to balance text and imagery, ensuring the story’s significance is communicated effectively.

Analyzing the Impact of Visual Storytelling in Print Media

Both newspapers demonstrate the power of visual storytelling in print journalism. Just as a well-crafted painting can evoke emotions and convey complex ideas, these front pages use photography to deepen the narrative. The Telegraph’s image acts like a snapshot of a pivotal moment, while The Times’ photograph serves as a window into the broader context of the news. This approach not only informs but also engages readers on a more personal level.

Conclusion: The Role of Newspaper Front Pages in Shaping Public Perception

Front pages remain a vital tool for newspapers to capture attention and frame the day’s most important stories. By combining compelling headlines with evocative images, publications like the Telegraph and The Times continue to influence public discourse and provide readers with a nuanced understanding of current events. As media consumption evolves, the art of the front page endures as a testament to the enduring power of print journalism.

Both the Guardian and the Daily Mail prominently featured Keir Starmer’s remarks regarding Reform UK in their recent editions, though their interpretations diverged significantly.

Burnham Criticizes Whitehall for Hindering Devolution Efforts

By Geraldine McKelvie, Senior Correspondent

Andy Burnham, the Mayor of Greater Manchester, has voiced frustration over what he describes as resistance within certain sectors of Whitehall to the decentralization of power from London.

During a fringe event focused on devolution, Burnham remarked:

“Devolution holds immense potential to drive economic growth. It’s astonishing that some parts of Whitehall continue to oppose it.

Greater Manchester’s productivity growth outpaces London’s by a factor of four. Why would anyone stand in the way of further progress?

The sooner Whitehall relinquishes control, the faster growth will accelerate.

While the momentum is building, it’s exasperating to repeatedly justify the need for devolution.

Even something as straightforward as sharing data from central government with regions like ours is met with suspicion. It’s baffling-we have official government email addresses, yet we’re still treated as outsiders. We should be fully integrated.”

Burnham refrained from naming specific individuals, attributing the opposition to institutional inertia rather than personal agendas. He noted that ministers have generally been supportive of his initiatives.

As an illustration of the powers he seeks, Burnham highlighted the need for Greater Manchester to have authority over a comprehensive visitor levy. He explained:

“We require a visitors’ levy, and I believe Steve Rotheram, Liverpool’s mayor, shares this view. Relying solely on council taxpayers is unsustainable, especially since council tax valuations haven’t been updated since 1991. We need greater autonomy to generate revenue.”

Currently, Manchester operates an optional visitor levy, but Burnham advocates for a more robust and mandatory system.

Responses to Labour’s Gaza Genocide Motion

Following the Labour conference’s approval of a motion recognizing genocide in Gaza and calling for an arms embargo, reactions have been swift.

Ben Jamal, director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, stated:

“This marks a significant setback for the government, with Labour finally acknowledging Israel’s actions in Gaza as genocide. This historic decision must translate into government policy, including comprehensive sanctions and a full arms embargo.

After nearly two years of complicity, the solidarity movement is gaining momentum. People nationwide are standing with Palestinians, demanding their freedom.

If the government ignores this decisive vote, it risks denying reality, alienating public opinion, and isolating itself internationally, while also conflicting with its own party members.”

Sasha Das Gupta, co-chair of Momentum, Labour’s left-wing faction, added:

“Labour’s vote to urge the government to end Israel’s genocide is a landmark moment, demonstrating unity within the labour movement against such atrocities.

Now, the government must heed its members and implement a full arms embargo on Israel.”

Shabana Mahmood Highlights Rising Ethno-Nationalism and Migration Policy Challenges

While Chancellor Rachel Reeves delivered the day’s keynote, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood’s address captivated many with its candid insights.

Mahmood opened by addressing a troubling surge in “ethno-nationalism” across the UK, referencing the “Unite the Kingdom” march led by Tommy Robinson. She described some participants as descendants of historical skinhead and racist groups who opposed her presence in Britain due to her Pakistani heritage.

“To dismiss that event would be to overlook a broader, more concerning trend in our country.

The narrative of our national identity is contested.

I am a proud patriot, embracing the inclusive patriotism championed by Orwell-a love for a nation that evolves yet remains fundamentally the same.

This patriotism celebrates openness, tolerance, and generosity.

However, this expansive vision is increasingly challenged.

Patriotism, once a unifying force, is being narrowed into ethno-nationalism, which struggles to accept people like me-who look different and practice different faiths-as truly British.

While some are beyond persuasion, many are shifting from patriotism toward ethno-nationalism, and this trajectory can be reversed.”

“People across the country feel a loss of control.

Without control, the conditions for an open and generous society erode.

When small boats arrive on our shores, many perceive a country that has lost its grip.

Illegal working undermines British workers, fostering a sense of injustice.

Unchecked crime breeds fear.

This is the legacy left by the Conservatives, whose current irrelevance is the consequence.”

Mahmood acknowledged that while the public sympathizes with those fleeing danger, support wanes if border management appears chaotic.

She cautioned Labour members that some forthcoming migration policies might be unpopular, hinting at potential restrictions on human rights to regain border control:

“In addressing this crisis, some of my actions may not be well-received.

We must reconsider longstanding legal frameworks and assumptions.

Without border control and the ability to decide who enters and leaves, we cannot maintain the open, tolerant society we all cherish.”

“Under the previous Conservative government, rapid and large-scale changes eroded public trust.

Between 2021 and 2024, net migration exceeded 2.6 million.

This included widespread misuse of the health and social care visa, with 710,000 arrivals.

Many entered and vanished into the black economy, betraying promises to ‘take back control.’

To preserve openness to migrants like my parents, we need a fair system for those already here.”

“The British public welcomes contributors.

Therefore, we will extend the residency requirement for indefinite leave to remain from five to ten years, with a consultation forthcoming.

Proposed criteria include employment, national insurance contributions, no benefit claims, English proficiency, a clean criminal record, and community involvement.

Without meeting these standards, automatic settlement should not be granted.

Some may qualify earlier based on contributions; others may face longer waits or be denied entirely.”

“This year’s ‘Summer of Action’ targeted street crime in 600 locations through increased policing, undercover operations, fines, and arrests.

Building on this, a ‘Winter of Action’ will focus on shoplifting and anti-social behavior during peak retail weeks.

Having worked behind the counter in my parents’ shop, I understand the impact of shoplifting and the need for firm action to protect communities.”

Pat McFadden to Probe Rising Mental Health-Related Sickness Benefits

Rowena Mason, Whitehall Editor

Pat McFadden, the newly appointed Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, has announced plans to investigate the surge in sickness benefit claims linked to mental health issues.

Speaking at a TBI fringe event, McFadden emphasized the importance of understanding the root causes behind the increase, describing it as a “duty of curiosity” for leadership to develop effective policies.

As of April 2024, approximately four million individuals in the UK were receiving health-related benefits, up from three million in 2019.

McFadden suggested that mental and physical health-related absences might require distinct policy approaches following a thorough review.

Earlier this year, Keir Starmer advocated for benefit reforms citing the “devastating” cost of sickness absence but faced resistance from Labour MPs, leading to the withdrawal of some proposed cuts.

McFadden stressed the need for politicians to build strong cases for any changes they pursue.

“My focus is on creating opportunities and promoting work, as I believe this is where the core issue lies,” he stated.

In his conference speech, McFadden highlighted a key policy developed with the Treasury: requiring young people unemployed for over 18 months to participate in work placements or risk losing benefits.

“It’s unacceptable on a human level and costly for the nation to allow a generation to be trapped on benefits before their lives have truly begun.

We refuse to accept that school leavers should transition directly into a life dependent on benefits.

Wasted talent must not define Britain’s future.”

Sadiq Khan Hesitates to Label Reform UK’s Immigration Policy as Racist, While David Lammy Condemns It

London Mayor Sadiq Khan refrained from branding Reform UK’s proposal to revoke indefinite leave to remain status as racist, expressing caution about diluting the impact of the term. In contrast, Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy explicitly condemned the policy as racist during his conference address.

Nigel Farage, despite his patriotic rhetoric, promotes policies that conflict with British values. The plan to detain and deport long-standing residents from French, Indian, and Caribbean backgrounds is, in Lammy’s words, “racist.” He declared: “Not in our country. Not in our name. Not in our time.”

However, Lammy’s claim about French nationals being targeted is inaccurate, as Reform UK has clarified that EU nationals with settled status will be exempt. This nuance strengthens arguments, like those from British Future’s Sunder Katwala, that the policy’s racial implications are more complex.

David Lammy Expresses Confidence in Labour’s Electoral Prospects and Highlights Party’s Legacy

Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Secretary David Lammy used his conference speech to inspire Labour members, emphasizing the party’s historical resilience and achievements during challenging periods.

Labour has consistently confronted difficult times head-on. Post-World War II, despite rationing and public fatigue, leaders like Attlee, Bevan, and Morrison established the NHS, new towns, and the welfare state.

During the 1967 economic crisis and the rise of Enoch Powell, Harold Wilson advanced technological innovation, the Open University, and equal pay legislation.

Entering Parliament in 2000 amid fuel protests and public dissent, Tony Blair’s government persevered, delivering record investments in education and healthcare, the minimum wage, and Sure Start programs.

Labour’s history is one of confronting challenges rather than avoiding them.

Recent achievements include five interest rate reductions, the fastest economic growth among G7 nations, and wage increases surpassing the previous decade under Conservative rule.

NHS waiting lists have been reduced, with five million additional appointments delivered, exceeding promises.

Parents benefit from thirty hours of free childcare, saving up to £7,500 annually.

Trade agreements with the EU, US, and India have been secured, and planning reforms have unlocked billions for housing, resulting in the highest construction rates in decades.

This exemplifies the tangible impact of a Labour government.

Lammy urged members to observe global political shifts, noting that progressive parties in Australia, Canada, and Norway overcame significant polling deficits to win elections.

He stressed that success comes from adhering to core values balanced with pragmatic realism, rejecting scapegoating and political theatrics in favor of hope, purpose, and progress.

Pro-Palestine Activists Disrupt Rachel Reeves’ Speech at Labour Conference

The Palestine Youth Movement and London for a Free Palestine have claimed responsibility for an interruption during Rachel Reeves’ address at the Labour conference. The protester, identified as “Sam P,” entered the stage waving a large Palestinian flag and questioned the UK’s continued arms sales to Israel.

“It’s unbearable to witness this British-backed genocide unfolding on our screens while Labour carries on as usual,” the activist stated in a subsequent release.

“We must do everything possible to end these atrocities.”

Security personnel removed the protester from the venue, and Merseyside police took over the situation.

Bridget Phillipson Announces Targeted Maintenance Grants for Disadvantaged Students, Funded by International Student Levy

Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson revealed plans to introduce new, means-tested maintenance grants aimed at supporting the most financially vulnerable students in England ahead of the next general election.

“Today, I am announcing that this Labour government will provide targeted maintenance grants for students who need them most,” Phillipson declared in her conference speech.

“Students should focus on their studies or training, not be forced to work excessive hours to make ends meet. This is the difference a Labour government makes.”

Labour’s official statement emphasized that these grants will assist tens of thousands of students pursuing level 4 to 6 qualifications in priority fields aligned with the industrial strategy and broader goals to revitalize Britain.

The grants will offer crucial financial support to working-class youth undertaking university degrees and technical qualifications, including Certificates and Diplomas of Higher Education, as well as technical certifications under the Lifelong Learning Entitlement.

Funding for these grants will come entirely from a new international student levy, ensuring that revenue generated from overseas students benefits domestic working-class learners and fosters growth and opportunity.

Additional details on the maintenance grants and the international student levy will be provided in the upcoming autumn statement.

Further information is available from the Department for Education.

Business Secretary Peter Kyle Highlights Surge in UK Investment Attributed to Labour Government

In his conference address, Business Secretary Peter Kyle asserted that the UK is experiencing increased investment inflows due to Labour’s governance.

“Companies that previously overlooked the UK are now committing to our future, our workforce, and our economy,” Kyle stated.

He cited major investments including:

• Microsoft’s £22 billion investment, the largest ever in the UK;
• Google’s £5 billion commitment;
• CoreWeave’s £1.5 billion investment;
• Salesforce’s £1.4 billion contribution.

Kyle attributed this influx of capital directly to the presence of a Labour government.

Andy Burnham Advocates for UK’s Reentry into the EU Within His Lifetime and Defends Fiscal Responsibility

Andy Burnham has publicly called for the United Kingdom to rejoin the European Union during his lifetime, emphasizing the benefits of renewed membership. He also rejected accusations that he is fiscally irresponsible, underscoring his commitment to prudent economic management.

Thornberry expressed her concerns at a Labour Climate and Environment Forum during the party’s annual conference, urging the government to exercise caution before approving the investment application, citing potential risks to national security.

She remarked:

My apprehension about Elon Musk and his intentions is significant, especially regarding what impact he might have on the nation. Any infrastructure investment decisions must prioritize security concerns above all else.

Therefore, it’s crucial to thoroughly evaluate whether it is appropriate for someone like Elon Musk to be permitted to invest in UK infrastructure.

Recently, Musk faced backlash after advocating for the toppling of the British government and was accused of encouraging unrest during a far-right rally in the UK.

Thornberry further commented:

It’s telling that China prohibits Teslas from being near government or public buildings due to espionage fears.

She also urged that Keir Starmer attend the upcoming COP climate summit and advocated for King Charles to be permitted to participate in the November conference.

She stated:

In six weeks, I will attend COP 30 in Belem to observe the actions governments are taking. This event offers a platform for leadership on climate change, and I expect senior figures, including the prime minister, to be present and actively involved.

It’s only fitting that the King should be allowed to attend; I’m sure he is eager to participate.

Treasury Minister Torsten Bell stirred controversy on Monday evening by ridiculing the appearance of Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey. He remarked:

What the UK truly requires to counter Farage is a compelling vision. Unfortunately, the Lib Dems offer nothing more than a portly man in a soaked suit, which is hardly the future Britain deserves in the 21st century.

This comment prompted a Liberal Democrat councillor from Liverpool, Carl Cashman, to accuse Labour of embodying “the nasty party.”

Burnham (55) Advocates for UK’s Reentry into the EU Within His Lifetime

Andy Burnham has openly declared his desire to witness the UK rejoining the European Union during his lifetime.

He expressed:

To be frank, I want to see the UK rejoin the EU. I hope to witness this momentous event within my lifetime.

At 55 years old, Burnham’s stance contrasts with that of Keir Starmer, aged 63, who has stated he does not anticipate the UK rejoining the EU during his lifetime.